What does quantum physics tell us about consciousness?

Quantum physics contradicts itself.

Whenever quantum physics attempts to be objective it betrays itself by exhibiting subjective results. Quantum physics (1) which is entangled with its methodology (2) reveals its weakness by not being able to offer any result about phenomenon which is less than the Planck length. In other words, Quantum physics results do not go all the way.

This tells me that the scope of quantum physics is fundamentally limited by its methods. Is there a better way?

Quantum physics investigates the physical realm by colliding particles together so that the physical realm reveal its fundamental particles only to find out that particles do not exist at quantum scales but instead quantum reality exhibit wave properties.

There is a fundamental difference between the characteristic properties of particles as opposed to the characteristic properties of waves. They are characteristically different from each other.

Let’s use another approach.

The conjecture here is that there exist a distinct bias that the realm of nature exhibits only one face at a time while keeping the other face hidden at the same time. We turn to cosmology to give us a clue. Quantum physics fails to recognize that the torus configuration - which is a geometrical idea - connects cosmology with atomic structure.

Clearly, that which the realm of nature displays is the disc shape of the galaxy. For all intents and purposes, the flatness is an exhibition of the galaxy’s electric nature while its magnetic field is the beam that goes through the middle of the galactic black hole centre. The electric field is associated with physicality whereas the magnetic field is associated with consciousness.

Studies of human chakras corroborate this.

Is this picture complete? We further investigate. We make a model of our observation at a much larger scale and come up with this..

Aha! Straightaway we recognize a torus. We think that this is a good model of the galaxy.

But how about at the atomic or subatomic level?

We check that the torus is a manifestation of a single geometric point. Geometrically, we can find out - conclude - that there exist structural correspondence between the atom and the galaxy.

Point to note: In terms of geometry, size does not matter as much as shape. We can view the galaxy as a giant torus and the atom as a minuscule torus, geometrically, they are both still a torus.

Hubble captures a black hole's 'shadow beams,' yawning across space - Hubble captures a black hole's 'shadow beams,' yawning across space

Basically the same thing here: Hubble Spots Shadow of Supermassive Black Hole’s Torus in IC 5063 - http://www.sci-news.com/astronomy/hubble-shadow-supermassive-black-hole-torus-09076.html

Quantum physics must recognize the orthogonal nature of visible-invisible reality as exemplified by the 90 degree angle that electric and magnetic fields form toward each other and take note of its consequences at much larger scales.

If we are unbiased, we can safely incorporate consciousness as the instantaneous connection between all entities in the universe.

The universe is not a physical phenomenon but only appears to be so. At every level, the evidence point to the universe as a geometrical phenomenon, not a physical one.

The universe is a geometrical phenomenon engendered from a consciousness that is independent of the universe and operates at every scale. As conscious beings, humans reflect this consciousness and is dependent on it.

Popular posts from this blog

How did Adam and Eve populate the earth with only two sons?

What is the purpose of living under a simulation?

Fractals mentioned as trees in the Quran